New feature 3 of 5 — Creatives as a global Explorer view
"Which creative performs best when used across multiple ads" — one row/card per ASSET, rolled up across every ad and campaign that runs it, all providers. The timeline panel (just locked) rides on top of this view too, plotting per-creative lines.
A
Table-first with thumbnails, gallery toggle (my recommendation)
The ranking workhorse: sortable columns answer "best creative" numerically; the restored small thumbnail gives the visual cue on every row; hover plays the preview; a Gallery toggle switches to browsing mode when the question is visual.
TableGallerysorted: Platform ROAS ▼ · min spend $100
Creative
Life
Ads · Camps
Spend 7d
Hook
CTR trend
Platform ROAS ▼
Our ROAS*
☐
nerd_escort_hook3_v2
SCALING
2 · 1
$744
31%
3.05
2.41
☐
wrangler_hook1_v4
SCALING
5 · 3
$1,910
27%
2.66
1.98
☐
nerd_escort_hook1
FATIGUING
3 · 2
$1,204
24%
1.71
1.52
☐
mafia_h1_intro
DEAD
2 · 1
$318
14%
0.42
0.55
* Our ROAS at creative grain = the blend of the campaigns it runs in (internal attribution is campaign-level — we don't fake per-creative precision; Platform ROAS IS exact per creative). "Ads · Camps" counts click through to the ads using it. A "min spend" guard keeps statistical noise out of the ranking.
✓ sortable ranking = the literal ask ✓ thumbnails restored as the fast visual cue ✓ same checkboxes → timeline emphasis + (Wave 2) bulk pause of all its ads
B
Gallery-first with sort chips
Visual browsing as the default — big cards, metrics beneath; sort chips instead of column headers. Table available behind a toggle.
nerd_escort_hook3_v2SCALING · $744 · ROAS 3.05
wrangler_hook1_v4SCALING · $1.9K · ROAS 2.66
nerd_escort_hook1FATIGUING · $1.2K · 1.71
✓ best for creative-team browsing sessions ✗ weaker for ranking/threshold work — the stated goal of this view
Recommendation: A — this view exists to *rank*, and the gallery is one toggle away for browsing. (The deep-dive Creatives tab keeps its gallery-first default — different question, different default.)